[ what the fucking fuck ]
Oct. 2nd, 2007 07:11 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
so sandy mccoy, jared's girlfriend, is going to be on the show.1
i'm told that makes a lot of people very happy. as it ought! i'm told that it makes even more people completely indifferent. as it ought for them, too.
and then, i'm told it makes some people very upset because the show is, apparently, JARED AND JENSEN'S. and not sandy's. apparently, her costume is slutty. apparently, having the girlfriend on set makes it harder to keep her in a seperate mental block from the holy sanctum of the sacred jsquared. apparently, the fact that she has sex makes her unclean or incapable of doing her job as an actress.
because fandom has been using and abusing this term like nobody's business lately, let me PSA for the masses, okay?
seriously, girls. let's try to be slighly less catty bitches, okay? let's have a nice threesome and call it a night.
ETA: just for the record, there are oodles of people out there who are over the moon happy about this. they're probably writing fic already. go them! i belong to what is surely the largest camp: people who don't much care one way or the other. and if the objection here were that people were arguing sandy was a crappy actress, well that i couldn't find fault with. i might agree or disagree with that opinion, but at least it's based on merit and not tits.
1. and just so you know, i got spoiled for this purely by accident and if any of you further spoil me there will be hell to pay. <3!!
i'm told that makes a lot of people very happy. as it ought! i'm told that it makes even more people completely indifferent. as it ought for them, too.
and then, i'm told it makes some people very upset because the show is, apparently, JARED AND JENSEN'S. and not sandy's. apparently, her costume is slutty. apparently, having the girlfriend on set makes it harder to keep her in a seperate mental block from the holy sanctum of the sacred jsquared. apparently, the fact that she has sex makes her unclean or incapable of doing her job as an actress.
because fandom has been using and abusing this term like nobody's business lately, let me PSA for the masses, okay?
tin·hat
Pronunciation: 'tin 'hat
Function: noun
Etymology: Sci-fi, from hat made of aluminum foil so as to keep the alien space rays from getting into your head.
1: Batshit insane.
2: Very gullible; given to believe any sort of ridiculous justification or story which might "prove" that a particular pairing either is happening or might happen.
The term was originally came into the fandom lexicon to define a particular sort of LotRiPS fan who was convinced that, because they allegedly had a series of secret signals such as tying shoes at particular times or wearing particular colors to events, Elijah Wood and Dominic Monahan were clearly dating. The secret signals were designed to communicate availability, positional preference, etc. I would love to tell you I was kidding with regard to this matter but I am not; people actually believed this.
seriously, girls. let's try to be slighly less catty bitches, okay? let's have a nice threesome and call it a night.
ETA: just for the record, there are oodles of people out there who are over the moon happy about this. they're probably writing fic already. go them! i belong to what is surely the largest camp: people who don't much care one way or the other. and if the objection here were that people were arguing sandy was a crappy actress, well that i couldn't find fault with. i might agree or disagree with that opinion, but at least it's based on merit and not tits.
1. and just so you know, i got spoiled for this purely by accident and if any of you further spoil me there will be hell to pay. <3!!
no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 01:16 am (UTC)She's really cute. I am pleased.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 01:21 am (UTC)but seriously, i've seen reactions that are like, my world is all askew i hate it she shouldn't be on the show and. just. for fuck's sake.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 01:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 01:23 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 01:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 01:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 01:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 01:26 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 01:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 01:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 01:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 01:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 01:25 am (UTC)People calling Sandy slutty because of a dress that got picked out by WARDROBE? Seriously, I fucking hate when ANYONE is called a slut, but this shit just reeks of ridiculous fangirl tinhattery.
Personally, I think she's cute as a button and as long as she does a good job, I have no complaints. I doubt if she was given the job simply because she's Jared's girlfriend. Kripke doesn't seem like the kind of guy that just give parts away because you happen to be dating a member of the cast/crew.
So whatever. You don't have to like the casting, but calling the girls on the show sluts or untalented or blah blah blah just because they're on the show? Fuckin' grow up. Junior high crap all the way.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 01:28 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 01:33 am (UTC)I just read a whole post of replies of people saying just that and all I can do is laugh HUGE belly laughs. My mind has been almost totally blown by how mean and nasty people are acting over it.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 01:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 01:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 01:40 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 01:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 01:44 am (UTC)IT'S NOT OKAY.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 02:19 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 01:56 am (UTC)The way (parts of) SPN fandom as a whole treats women is starting to ... god, it's starting to grate. Apparently, to be
respectedtolerated you must a) dress/act like a nun and b) live in a black hole - where you may be neither seen nor heard, only mentioned on very brief occasions. People have been tossing degrading words like 'slut', 'bimbo', and 'whore' around like they're nothing and I just ... FUCK, Danny, sometimes I just want to reach through the screen and throttle these people. Yeah, I'm kind of sensitive. Every time a woman calls another woman these things, kittens die. And that is NOT GOOD.Hell, I'm looking forward to Sandy being on the show. And I usually get weirded out by actors' significant others appearing on their shows (more 'cause it makes me go ooh! so-and-so's girlfriend! ;) - maybe takes me out of the moment), but I think I make all the exceptions in the world for Jensen and Jared. :P So, yeah. Little weirded out, but I'm still psyched about it, for various spoilery reasons. :)
The most surefire way to get me to get even MORE psyched about something is to say something asshatty about it. Saying she looks slutty? Yeah, that makes me want to love the idea more. *glares at the world*
no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 02:23 am (UTC)i am exactly the same way wrt being determined to love that underdog, i tell you what. :)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 02:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 02:07 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 02:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 02:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 02:21 am (UTC)I'm having a really hard time with the way many fandoms treat/talk about women. And I'm trying hard to figure out whether it's just particular fandoms, or whether it's a development across the board in recent years. I'm seeing things in the SPN and Smallville fandoms that are deeply discouraging to my liberal, feminist heart... it's just so bad in comparison to the Farscape fandom, when Ben Browder's wife would periodically turn up in guest roles, and the fans were always positively delighted to see her. Whenever there was a con appearance, someone was certain to ask, "Hey, when's Fran coming back? Can't you make her a regular or something?"
Again, I'm not sure whether it's a particular fandom thing, or whether it's a societal sea change. And I really hope that it's just particular fandoms, although on my more depressed, "What the hell is wrong with people???" days, I think it's part of a larger pattern of backlash against women.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 02:26 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 02:43 am (UTC)The longer I'm in fandom, the more I'm convinced that threesomes are the answer to all possible problems. *nods*
no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 02:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 02:58 am (UTC)Also, someone mentioned that the fangirls are starting a trend of treating the actresses like shit when they supposedly get in the way of our sekrit love affairs with male actors. I have also noticed this trend (re: Weir-hate and especially Carter-hate in the SG-1/SGA fandoms) and this puzzles me. The fen demographic is overwhelmingly female and dominantly liberal. Shouldn't we be the ones who protest when female characters aren't used to their full potential on-screen and sometimes degraded as mere sex symbols? Ladies, let's get our heads out of our posteriors please. This is an issue that we should be fighting against, not perpetuating!
no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 03:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 03:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 03:13 am (UTC)but as you say, at least it's merit-based, y'know? jesus.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 03:10 am (UTC)Hahaha my favorite was when someone said something like NOW I'M NOT SURE IF JARED DIDN'T GET HER THE ROLES ON PUSSYCAT AND VM.
In conclusion, SAY NOT TO TINHATS.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 03:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 03:17 am (UTC)As far as I'm concerned, I think it's great that Sandy will be on the show. :D She's adorable!
no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 03:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 03:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 03:30 am (UTC)FANS of actors, the way you and i are FANS of jared padalecki, should be trying to find ways to feel happy for him. it's true. *hands*
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 03:31 am (UTC)Hi danny! Do you know that we met because of a similar rant of yours against internalized misogny (and my approval of said rant)? We did!
no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 08:41 pm (UTC)did u know i am going to meet u at winchestercon? trufax.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 03:34 am (UTC)And now I know.
And knowing is half the battle. GI Joe!
Personally, I don't care she's on the show so long as she doesn't suck in the role.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 08:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 06:40 am (UTC)So, yeah. I question her taste sometimes (what, with her trying to be a Pussycat Doll and all) but I have no real complaint about Sandy.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 08:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 07:58 am (UTC)I am pissed about the casting for one epic reason: why isn't she making out with Jensen, why??? Oh, the kiss that would have launched a thousand glorious RPF fics. With Jensen smirking and teasing Jared about making time with his girl and Jared not being able to stop himself from asking Sandy how Jen tasted, how his lips feel. And then loads and loads of hot threesome sexin' would occur in every position ever. Owwwww! Oh, whatever, clearly I am on the cracksauce and need help stat. But still!
In conclusion: concur, threesomes FTW!
no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 04:13 pm (UTC)Apparently I'm on the cracksauce, too, because GUH, and YES PLEASE!
Are you SURE she doesn't make out with Jensen? *whimpers*
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: