I still think it's a Too Many Cooks problem -- I seriously doubt that the 6A team has sat down and said "okay, let's hash out a coherent company-wide policy on this and communicate that to LJ Abuse as well as all LJ members in a news posting". So instead they've got little Johnny and little Susie and little theljstaff all saying different things because there is no overarching line to lay down.
Now, since I work in a company and have seen how decisions get made in companies, I am not surprised that they do not yet have something perfectly coherent laid out. But it would surprise me greatly if a coherent platform does not emerge about what LJ will and will not allow. Bits of it have already started popping up. I may not like some of them (uh, the No Warning Insta-Ban provision is not exactly my favorite part, if you get my drift), but they're emerging. I really do want to believe the best from 6A since, like it or not, I've already invested my $.
no subject
Now, since I work in a company and have seen how decisions get made in companies, I am not surprised that they do not yet have something perfectly coherent laid out. But it would surprise me greatly if a coherent platform does not emerge about what LJ will and will not allow. Bits of it have already started popping up. I may not like some of them (uh, the No Warning Insta-Ban provision is not exactly my favorite part, if you get my drift), but they're emerging. I really do want to believe the best from 6A since, like it or not, I've already invested my $.